Skip to the page content
Passes our checks

Access to Medicines Initiative Inc

EIN 99-2821046 · Tucson, AZ

Public records show a registered, tax-exempt organization in good standing.

LegitimacyPassesRegistration and standingFinancial healthStrong90 out of 100GovernanceNot ratedThe short tax form does not cover thisImpact evidenceDescribes programsHow well its results are evidenced

What it says it does

The Organization's Primary exempt purpose is to reduce unintended pregnancies and maternal deaths in Nigeria by improving access to contraceptives through supply-chain support, data systems, and government capacity building.

Income
$127,000
Spending
$78,906
Reserves
7.3 months of spending
Largest source of income
donations and private grants, 100%
Highest pay
$24,000, treasurer & director

Source: Form 990EZ for the year ending December 31, 2024, filed with the Internal Revenue Service. Rating method 2026.2. How we rate

Financial health

Strong: 90 out of 100. Higher than 77% of charities in its peer group (international, under $250k).

  • Reserves

    28 of 35

    Spendable reserves would cover 7.3 months of spending.

  • Debt

    20 of 20

    It owes 0% of what it owns.

  • Living within its means

    15 of 15

    Income exceeded spending by 38% of income.

Source: Form 990EZ for the year ending December 31, 2024, filed with the Internal Revenue Service. Rating method 2026.2. How we rate

Governance

This organization files the short tax form, which does not ask about boards, policies or audits. That is normal for a small charity and is not a mark against it.

Source: Form 990EZ for the year ending December 31, 2024, filed with the Internal Revenue Service. Rating method 2026.2. How we rate

Impact evidence

Describes programs. Its tax return describes what it does but we have found no measurable results in it.

Programs described in its return (1)
  1. $22,585 spent. In our first year, Access to Medicines Initiative (AMI) conducted a pilot intervention across 137 primary and secondary public health facilities in Northern Nigeria (in Katsina State and Sokoto State) from September 2024 continuing into 2025. We sought to 1) diagnose supply-chain bottlenecks in contraceptive commodity availability, 2) test how much uptake could increase when supply constraints were removed, and 3) refine a scalable model for state-level rollout. We divided the participating facilities into 3 groups, and each group was assigned a reporting tool to be used to report the consumption and availability of family planning commodities in their facility. The goal was to assess which is most accurate in reporting the stock of commodities available in facilities at any given time. We trained one health worker from each participating facility on how to fill in this survey, either via SMS or WhatsApp, as well as a new paper register we distributed to each facility. The new paper register was meant to capture the number of clients coming in for a family planning consultation, but leaving without taking up a method, as well as the reason for this. Previously, this data was never captured, and we wanted to get a sense of how many women left facilities empty handed due to stockouts. We provided small monthly data stipends to each participating health worker, as well as ongoing support. To measure the impact of these supply chain issues, we provided additional contraceptives and auxiliary commodities such as examination and surgical gloves, syringes, disinfectant and plasters to some of the facilities in each state. By measuring the change in consumption due to this additional stock compared to previous periods and to the facilities not receiving additional commodities, we aimed to gain a better understanding of how stockouts impact contraceptive consumption. After collecting and analyzing facility consumption data, we found that facilities receiving additional contraceptives showed large increases in use compared to baseline levels, while control facilities showed little or no change. In treatment facilities, consumption of oral contraceptives increased by approximately 70 percent, contraceptive injections by 30 percent, condoms by 240 percent, and implants by 90 percent. Based on these results, we estimate the pilot generated more than 1,100 additional Couple Years of Protection, representing the equivalent of providing one year of contraceptive protection to more than 1,100 women. Our paper registers contained data from almost 11,000 visits, showing that almost 80% of these women who came in for a family planning consultation but left empty handed did so because of lack of commodities.

Source: Form 990EZ for the year ending December 31, 2024, filed with the Internal Revenue Service. Rating method 2026.2. How we rate

Legitimacy checks

  1. Is it registered with the IRS? Passed.

    Listed in the IRS master file of tax-exempt organizations as a 501(c)(3) charitable organization.

    Source: Exempt Organizations Business Master File, Internal Revenue Service, file dated October 13, 2026.

  2. Has the IRS revoked its tax-exempt status? Passed.

    Not on the IRS automatic revocation list.

    Source: Automatic revocation of exemption list, Internal Revenue Service, file dated October 13, 2026.

  3. Are donations tax-deductible? Passed.

    On the IRS list of organizations eligible to receive tax-deductible contributions.

    Source: Publication 78 data: organizations eligible for tax-deductible contributions, Internal Revenue Service, file dated October 13, 2026.

  4. Is it keeping up with its IRS filings? Passed.

    Most recent return on file covers the year ending December 2024.

    Source: Exempt Organizations Business Master File, Internal Revenue Service, file dated October 13, 2026.

  5. How long has it been tax-exempt? Passed.

    Recognized by the IRS since December 2024.

    Source: Exempt Organizations Business Master File, Internal Revenue Service, file dated October 13, 2026.

  6. Is it in good standing with state regulators? Passed.

    Not on California's list of charities barred from soliciting. Other states are not yet checked.

    Source: May Not Operate or Solicit for Charitable Purposes list, California Attorney General, Registry of Charities and Fundraisers, file dated October 21, 2026.

Ratings and checks are our reading of public records, using the published method. They are not a statement about anyone's honesty. If you work for this organization, you can send corrections or results, confirm you want gifts through Veridonate, or ask to be removed from giving.