Science for America Inc
Public records show a registered, tax-exempt organization in good standing.
What it says it does
SCIENCE FOR AMERICA IS A "SOLUTIONS INCUBATOR" ROOTED IN BOLD SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNOLOGICAL POSSIBILITIES WORKING TO DEVELOP VISION, STRATEGY, AND EXECUTION PLANS, AND TO ENSURE THE LAUNCH AND SUCCESS OF THOSE SOLUTIONS SCIENCE FOR AMERICA BRINGS TOGETHER SCIENTISTS AND TECHNOLOGISTS AND WORKS WITH PARTNERS ACROSS SECTORS TO:-IDENTIFY POTENTIAL GAME-CHANGING SOLUTIONS TO URGENT CHALLENGES, IN THE US AND AROUND THE WORLD, THAT ARE NOT CURRENTLY HAPPENING, -DEVELOP CLEAR VISION, STRATEGY AND EXECUTION PLANS, AND-ENSURE THE LAUNCH AND SUCCESS OF THOSE SOLUTIONS, BY INCUBATING THEM TO AN APPROPRIATE STAGE.POSSIBLE SOLUTIONS MAY INCLUDE THE CREATION OF PROJECTS, INITIATIVES, SHARED FACILITIES, COALITIONS, NEW COMPANIES, PRIZES, AND ADVOCACY EFFORTS.
- Income
- $659,896
- Spending
- $4.4 million
- Spent on programs
- 56%
- Reserves
- 45.4 months of spending
- Largest source of income
- investment income, 100%
- Employees
- 0
- Volunteers
- 3
- Highest pay
- $369,488, coo & treasurer
Source: Form 990 for the year ending December 31, 2025, filed with the Internal Revenue Service. Rating method 2026.2. How we rate
Financial health
Fair: 63 out of 100. Higher than 26% of charities in its peer group (science, $250k to $1m).
Reserves
35 of 35Spendable reserves would cover 45.4 months of spending.
Debt
20 of 20It owes 1% of what it owns.
Living within its means
0 of 15Spending exceeded income by 568% of income.
Income trend
0 of 15Income fell 94% on the year before.
Spending floor
8 of 1556% of spending went to programs.
Source: Form 990 for the year ending December 31, 2025, filed with the Internal Revenue Service. Rating method 2026.2. How we rate
Governance
Strong: 95 out of 100. Higher than 91% of charities in its peer group (science, $250k to $1m).
Independent board
25 of 253 of 5 voting board members are independent.
Conflict of interest policy
15 of 15Has a written conflict of interest policy.
Whistleblower policy
8 of 8Has a written whistleblower policy.
Record keeping policy
7 of 7Has a written policy on keeping and destroying records.
Board minutes
5 of 5Keeps minutes of board meetings.
Board sees the tax return
10 of 10Gave the board a copy of this return before filing it.
Pay set independently
0 of 5Reports no independent review process for its chief executive's pay.
Independent check of accounts
15 of 15Its accounts were audited by an independent accountant.
No reported misuse
10 of 10Reports no diversion of assets, excess benefits or loans to insiders.
Source: Form 990 for the year ending December 31, 2025, filed with the Internal Revenue Service. Rating method 2026.2. How we rate
Impact evidence
Describes programs. Its tax return describes what it does but we have found no measurable results in it.
Programs described in its return (3)
- $938,974 spent. CLIMATE AND ENERGY - WE HAVE DEDICATED EFFORT TO SYNTHESIZING OUR ANALYSES ON CARBON CAPTURE, STORAGE, AND UTILIZATION. WHILE WE NEED TO RAPIDLY STOP ADDING LARGE AMOUNTS OF CARBON DIOXIDE (CO2) AND OTHER GREENHOUSE GASSES TO THE ATMOSPHERE, EVEN THE MOST AGGRESSIVE PLANS FOR DECARBONIZATION REQUIRE REMOVING 10-20 BILLION TONS OF CO2 EACH YEAR TO REACH NET-ZERO. THE CHALLENGE IS, CARBON DIOXIDE REMOVAL AND STORAGE TODAY IS VERY EXPENSIVE AND NOT READY TO SCALE TO GIGATON-LEVELS.
- $915,395 spent. HEALTH - WE PROPOSE A NATIONWIDE SYSTEM FOR RAPID DRUG EVALUATION TO INTERCEPT CANCER RECURRENCE AT ITS EARLIEST MOLECULAR STAGE. THE SYSTEM UNITES A CRITICAL MASS OF CANCER CENTERS, ENGAGED PATIENTS, AND TRIAL SPONSORS VIA A PLATFORM FOR SURVEILLANCE, TRIAL SCREENING, AND EVIDENCE GENERATION THAT WILL DELIVER EFFICIENCY, EFFECTIVENESS, AND IMPACT IN HOW WE TREAT CANCER PATIENTS AND CONDUCT CLINICAL RESEARCH. WE HAVE PUBLISHED AN ARTICLE IN NATURE REVIEW CANCER ("A STANDING PLATFORM FOR CANCER DRUG DEVELOPMENT USING CTDNA-BASED EVIDENCE OF RECURRENCE") WHICH CAN ALSO BE FOUND ON OUR WEBSITE.
- $614,564 spent. STEM EQUITY AND EDUCATION - WE WANTED TO BETTER UNDERSTAND WHICH GROUPS ARE UNDERREPRESENTED IN STEM, HOW MUCH ARE THEY UNDERREPRESENTED BY, AND ARE SOME UNIVERSITIES DOING BETTER THAN OTHERS AT DIVERSIFYING THEIR STEM STUDENT POPULATION. WE STARTED BY LOOKING AT RELATIVE REPRESENTATION: THE REPRESENTATION OF A GROUP RELATIVE TO THEIR REPRESENTATION IN A BASELINE POPULATION. CALCULATING A GIVEN POPULATION'S REPRESENTATION IN STEM AT A COLLEGE COMPARED TO THAT POPULATION'S BASELINE REPRESENTATION IN THE SAME COLLEGE'S OVERALL POPULATION MAY ALLOW US TO EVALUATE CURRENT DEMOGRAPHICS TO SEE IF THERE ARE PATTERNS OF OVER OR UNDER REPRESENTATION FOR CERTAIN GROUPS IN STEM, RELATIVE TO THEIR REPRESENTATION ACROSS THAT UNIVERSITY AS A WHOLE.
Source: Form 990 for the year ending December 31, 2025, filed with the Internal Revenue Service. Rating method 2026.2. How we rate
Legitimacy checks
Is it registered with the IRS? Passed.
Listed in the IRS master file of tax-exempt organizations as a 501(c)(3) charitable organization.
Source: Exempt Organizations Business Master File, Internal Revenue Service, file dated October 13, 2026.
Has the IRS revoked its tax-exempt status? Passed.
Not on the IRS automatic revocation list.
Source: Automatic revocation of exemption list, Internal Revenue Service, file dated November 6, 2026.
Are donations tax-deductible? Passed.
On the IRS list of organizations eligible to receive tax-deductible contributions.
Source: Publication 78 data: organizations eligible for tax-deductible contributions, Internal Revenue Service, file dated October 13, 2026.
Is it keeping up with its IRS filings? Passed.
Most recent return on file covers the year ending December 2025.
Source: Exempt Organizations Business Master File, Internal Revenue Service, file dated October 13, 2026.
How long has it been tax-exempt? Passed.
Recognized by the IRS since July 2022.
Source: Exempt Organizations Business Master File, Internal Revenue Service, file dated October 13, 2026.
Is it in good standing with state regulators? Passed.
Not on California's list of charities barred from soliciting. Other states are not yet checked.
Source: May Not Operate or Solicit for Charitable Purposes list, California Attorney General, Registry of Charities and Fundraisers, file dated November 4, 2026.
Ratings and checks are our reading of public records, using the published method. They are not a statement about anyone's honesty. If you work for this organization, you can send corrections or results, confirm you want gifts through Veridonate, or ask to be removed from giving.