Skip to the page content
Passes our checks

Clayton Foundation for Research

EIN 74-1541767 · Houston, TX

Public records show a registered, tax-exempt organization in good standing.

LegitimacyPassesRegistration and standingFinancial healthStrong100 out of 100GovernanceGood80 out of 100Impact evidenceDescribes programsHow well its results are evidenced

What it says it does

The primary mission is to conduct medical research in conjunction with hospitals for the purpose of discovering the cause, prevention and cure of diseases for the benefit of mankind. The secondary mission is to transfer the resulting medical research discoveries from the laboratory to the use of the general public by patenting and licensing such technology for development into drugs or other products for the use and benefit of mankind through the Foundation's supporting entities.

Income
$14.9 million
Spending
$10.9 million
Spent on programs
83%
Reserves
104.2 months of spending
Largest source of income
investment income, 86%
Employees
53
Highest pay
$785,428, trustee, president, treasurer

Source: Form 990 for the year ending December 31, 2024, filed with the Internal Revenue Service. Rating method 2026.2. How we rate

Financial health

Strong: 100 out of 100. Higher than 92% of charities in its peer group (medical research, $10m to $100m).

  • Reserves

    35 of 35

    Spendable reserves would cover 104.2 months of spending.

  • Debt

    20 of 20

    It owes 5% of what it owns.

  • Living within its means

    15 of 15

    Income exceeded spending by 26% of income.

  • Income trend

    15 of 15

    Income rose 35% on the year before.

  • Spending floor

    15 of 15

    83% of spending went to programs and raising each dollar of donations cost 0 cents.

Source: Form 990 for the year ending December 31, 2024, filed with the Internal Revenue Service. Rating method 2026.2. How we rate

Governance

Good: 80 out of 100. Higher than 13% of charities in its peer group (medical research, $10m to $100m).

  • Independent board

    5 of 25

    0 of 5 voting board members are independent.

  • Conflict of interest policy

    15 of 15

    Has a written conflict of interest policy.

  • Whistleblower policy

    8 of 8

    Has a written whistleblower policy.

  • Record keeping policy

    7 of 7

    Has a written policy on keeping and destroying records.

  • Board minutes

    5 of 5

    Keeps minutes of board meetings.

  • Board sees the tax return

    10 of 10

    Gave the board a copy of this return before filing it.

  • Pay set independently

    5 of 5

    Sets its chief executive's pay through independent review and comparison.

  • Independent check of accounts

    15 of 15

    Its accounts were audited by an independent accountant.

  • No reported misuse

    10 of 10

    Reports no diversion of assets, excess benefits or loans to insiders.

Source: Form 990 for the year ending December 31, 2024, filed with the Internal Revenue Service. Rating method 2026.2. How we rate

Impact evidence

Describes programs. Its tax return describes what it does but we have found no measurable results in it.

Programs described in its return (15)
  1. $1.0 million spent. A long standing research project at the University of Texas at Austin under the direction of Dr. Brent Iverson is in the field of engineering proteases. One aim of the project is to discover engineered proteases that will serve as more efficient, next generation antibody replacements. The engineered proteases will cleave the protein disease target in a catalytic fashion, thus requiring much less drug and enabling far lower doses and potentially fewer side effects. This project has resulted in the generation of a technology platform to support the development of protease therapeutics called Yeast Endoplasmic Reticulum Sequestration Screening (YESS). In addition to protease engineering, this platform is generating valuable information on enzyme substrate profiling. This allows to profile resistance in kinase inhibitor drugs and to generate kinase inhibitors and protease inhibitors with very low resistance and much higher specificity. This platform has been validated, and lead small drug candidates are currently being developed. Several publications have created interest in the scientific community in the YESS platform. Patent applications have been filed by RDF, one of the Foundation?s supporting entities, on several discoveries arising out of this research.
  2. $964,510 spent. A research project at Baylor College of Medicine in gene and protein therapy focuses on inappropriate cell division and cell death within the human body. Much of the work is devoted to intraocular angiogenesis, with particular attention to: (1) the signals that control this process, (2) the development of animal models of human ocular disease, and (3) development of potential therapies. New targets have been identified and potential therapeutic agents are being developed and tested for the treatment of wet AMD, Diabetic Retinopathy, and Retinopathy of Prematurity.
  3. $910,134 spent. The conduct of a longstanding research program at the University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center(which program moved to Texas A&M Institute of Biosciences and and Technology during the year) , the purpose of which is to design and develop novel targeted therapeutic agents that target a powerful human toxin to specifically destroy cancer cells for the treatment of numerous cancer targets and other disease indications. A number of collaborations have been undertaken with researchers at various institutions (e.g., University of California San Diego). Patent applications have been filed by Research Development Foundation (RDF), a tax exempt supporting organization of the Foundation (see schedule R, Part III), on more than twenty discoveries, and a number of patents have been issued. Licensing efforts have been ongoing and have resulted in several licenses.
  4. $825,546 spent. Vaccines, Diagnostics and Therapeutics for the Ehrlichioses at The Univerity of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston
  5. $807,116 spent. Development of Biorepository and Novel Therapeutic Strategies for Hepatocellular Carcinoma at the University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
  6. $674,935 spent. Early Detection and Treatment of Glaucoma Baylor College of Medicine Houston
  7. $637,144 spent. Identification of Host-based Antiviral Targets at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center Dallas
  8. $622,259 spent. The Use of Light for Cardiological, Surgical, and Related Purposes at the University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
  9. $589,586 spent. Antibody Discovery and Optimization Using the Eclonal Technology at The University of Texas at Austin
  10. $495,150 spent. Electroceutical Sciences and Medicine at Dell Medical School at the University of Texas
  11. $491,527 spent. Developing Drug Delivery Systems for Testing Solid Tumors at Dell Medical School at the University of Texas
  12. $425,701 spent. Discovering New Mechanisms and Therapeutics for Brain Injury at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center Dallas
  13. $361,410 spent. Development of Artificial Neurotransmitter Systems at the University of Texas at Austin
  14. $236,704 spent. Optimization and Charactorization of AAV for Gene Therapy at Dell Medical School at The University of Texas
  15. Grants

Source: Form 990 for the year ending December 31, 2024, filed with the Internal Revenue Service. Rating method 2026.2. How we rate

Legitimacy checks

  1. Is it registered with the IRS? Passed.

    Listed in the IRS master file of tax-exempt organizations as a 501(c)(3) charitable organization.

    Source: Exempt Organizations Business Master File, Internal Revenue Service, file dated October 13, 2026.

  2. Has the IRS revoked its tax-exempt status? Passed.

    Not on the IRS automatic revocation list.

    Source: Automatic revocation of exemption list, Internal Revenue Service, file dated October 13, 2026.

  3. Are donations tax-deductible? Passed.

    On the IRS list of organizations eligible to receive tax-deductible contributions.

    Source: Publication 78 data: organizations eligible for tax-deductible contributions, Internal Revenue Service, file dated October 13, 2026.

  4. Is it keeping up with its IRS filings? Passed.

    Most recent return on file covers the year ending December 2024.

    Source: Exempt Organizations Business Master File, Internal Revenue Service, file dated October 13, 2026.

  5. How long has it been tax-exempt? Passed.

    Recognized by the IRS since July 1966.

    Source: Exempt Organizations Business Master File, Internal Revenue Service, file dated October 13, 2026.

  6. Is it in good standing with state regulators? Passed.

    Not on California's list of charities barred from soliciting. Other states are not yet checked.

    Source: May Not Operate or Solicit for Charitable Purposes list, California Attorney General, Registry of Charities and Fundraisers, file dated October 21, 2026.

Ratings and checks are our reading of public records, using the published method. They are not a statement about anyone's honesty. If you work for this organization, you can send corrections or results, confirm you want gifts through Veridonate, or ask to be removed from giving.