Skip to the page content
Your donations
Passes our checks

National Girls Collaborative

EIN 47-1608990 · Seattle, WA

Public records show a registered, tax-exempt organization in good standing.

LegitimacyPassesRegistration and standingFinancial healthWeak30 out of 100GovernanceGood86 out of 100Impact evidenceDescribes programsHow well its results are evidenced

Points to look into

  • It owes more than it owns.

These come from the organization's own tax return. There may be a good explanation; ask the charity.

What it says it does

THE NATIONAL GIRLS COLLABORATIVE PROJECT BELIEVES SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY, ENGINEERING, AND MATHEMATICS (STEM) SKILLS CAN BE ACQUIRED BY ANYONE AND FOSTERED IN EVERYONE. OUR INITIATIVES BUILD CONFIDENCE AND CREATE A COMMUNITY OF "LIFELONG STEM ACTIVATORS." THROUGH THE POWER OF COLLABORATION, WE SPARK CURIOSITY AND DEVELOP A PASSION FOR STEM. WE ALSO STRENGTHEN THE CAPACITY OF PROGRAMS BY PRODUCING AND SHARING EXEMPLARY PRACTICES, RESEARCH, AND PROGRAM MODELS TO CREATE STEM EXPERIENCES AS DIVERSE AS THE WORLD WE LIVE IN.

Income
$916,915
Spending
$891,547
Spent on programs
75%
Reserves
-0.2 months of spending
Largest source of income
fees for its services, 67%
Employees
10
Volunteers
8
Highest pay
$103,125, chief executive officer

Source: Form 990 for the year ending December 31, 2025, filed with the Internal Revenue Service. Rating method 2026.2. How we rate

Financial health

Weak: 30 out of 100. Higher than 4% of charities in its peer group (youth development, $250k to $1m).

  • Reserves

    0 of 35

    Spendable reserves are negative: it owes or has committed more than it holds.

  • Debt

    0 of 20

    It owes 109% of what it owns.

  • Living within its means

    15 of 15

    Income exceeded spending by 3% of income.

  • Income trend

    0 of 15

    Income fell 32% on the year before.

  • Spending floor

    15 of 15

    75% of spending went to programs and raising each dollar of donations cost 17 cents.

Source: Form 990 for the year ending December 31, 2025, filed with the Internal Revenue Service. Rating method 2026.2. How we rate

Governance

Good: 86 out of 100. Higher than 75% of charities in its peer group (youth development, $250k to $1m).

  • Independent board

    25 of 25

    8 of 8 voting board members are independent.

  • Conflict of interest policy

    15 of 15

    Has a written conflict of interest policy.

  • Whistleblower policy

    8 of 8

    Has a written whistleblower policy.

  • Record keeping policy

    7 of 7

    Has a written policy on keeping and destroying records.

  • Board minutes

    5 of 5

    Keeps minutes of board meetings.

  • Board sees the tax return

    10 of 10

    Gave the board a copy of this return before filing it.

  • Pay set independently

    0 of 5

    Reports no independent review process for its chief executive's pay.

  • Independent check of accounts

    6 of 15

    Its accounts were not audited or reviewed by an independent accountant.

  • No reported misuse

    10 of 10

    Reports no diversion of assets, excess benefits or loans to insiders.

Source: Form 990 for the year ending December 31, 2025, filed with the Internal Revenue Service. Rating method 2026.2. How we rate

Impact evidence

Describes programs. Its tax return describes what it does but we have found no measurable results in it.

Programs described in its return (1)
  1. $666,567 spent. THE NATIONAL GIRLS COLLABORATIVE PROVIDES RESOURCES, STRATEGIES, AND TRAINING TO ORGANIZATIONS ACROSS THE UNITED STATES WHO PROVIDE STEM EDUCATION. THE NATIONAL GIRLS COLLABORATIVE ALSO OPERATES ON A LOCAL BASIS PROVIDING SUPPORT TO STATE LEADERSHIP TEAMS. EACH COLLABORATIVE HAS A DEFINED REGION, ACTING AS A HUB FOR LOCAL PROGRAMS TO COORDINATE RESOURCES AND REACH STEM PROGRAMS IN THE COMMUNITY. CURRENTLY, 33 NGC COLLABORATIVES SERVE 41 STATES, FACILITATING COLLABORATION BETWEEN 42,500 ORGANIZATIONS WHO SERVE 20.20 MILLION GIRLS AND 14 MILLION BOYS.

Source: Form 990 for the year ending December 31, 2025, filed with the Internal Revenue Service. Rating method 2026.2. How we rate

Legitimacy checks

  1. Is it registered with the IRS? Passed.

    Listed in the IRS master file of tax-exempt organizations as a 501(c)(3) charitable organization.

    Source: Exempt Organizations Business Master File, Internal Revenue Service, file dated October 13, 2026.

  2. Has the IRS revoked its tax-exempt status? Worth knowing.

    Status was revoked on May 15, 2017 for not filing returns for three years, and reinstated on May 15, 2017.

    Source: Automatic revocation of exemption list, Internal Revenue Service, file dated October 13, 2026.

  3. Are donations tax-deductible? Passed.

    On the IRS list of organizations eligible to receive tax-deductible contributions.

    Source: Publication 78 data: organizations eligible for tax-deductible contributions, Internal Revenue Service, file dated October 13, 2026.

  4. Is it keeping up with its IRS filings? Passed.

    Most recent return on file covers the year ending December 2025.

    Source: Exempt Organizations Business Master File, Internal Revenue Service, file dated October 13, 2026.

  5. How long has it been tax-exempt? Passed.

    Recognized by the IRS since October 2019.

    Source: Exempt Organizations Business Master File, Internal Revenue Service, file dated October 13, 2026.

  6. Is it in good standing with state regulators? Passed.

    Not on California's list of charities barred from soliciting. Other states are not yet checked.

    Source: May Not Operate or Solicit for Charitable Purposes list, California Attorney General, Registry of Charities and Fundraisers, file dated October 21, 2026.

Ratings and checks are our reading of public records, using the published method. They are not a statement about anyone's honesty. If you work for this organization, you can send corrections or results, confirm you want gifts through Veridonate, or ask to be removed from giving.