Skip to the page content
Passes our checks

Region II Commission on Services to the Aging

EIN 38-2056030 · Brooklyn, MI

Public records show a registered, tax-exempt organization in good standing.

LegitimacyPassesRegistration and standingFinancial healthFair68 out of 100GovernanceStrong100 out of 100Impact evidenceDescribes programsHow well its results are evidenced

What it says it does

THE AREA AGENCY ON AGING'S MISSION IS TO IMPROVE CONDITIONS AFFECTING THE LIVES OF THE OLDER ADULTS AND INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES IN THE REGION BY: IDENTIFYING CONCERNS OF THOSE PEOPLE AND DEVELOPING A COMPREHENSIVE AND COORDINATED NETWORK OF SERVICES IN HILLSDALE, JACKSON AND LENAWEE COUNTIES THAT WILL ENABLE OLDER PERSONS AND INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES TO FUNCTION AS INDEPENDENTLY AS POSSIBLE IN THEIR HOMES AND COMMUNITIES; PROVIDING ADVOCACY, INFORMATION, PLANNING, PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT, CONTRACTING AND THE FUNDING NECESSARY TO ACCOMPLISH THIS PURPOSE.

Income
$33.9 million
Spending
$33.4 million
Spent on programs
94%
Reserves
2.6 months of spending
Largest source of income
fees for its services, 84%
Employees
80
Volunteers
49
Highest pay
$194,448, chief executive officer

Source: Form 990 for the year ending September 30, 2025, filed with the Internal Revenue Service. Rating method 2026.2. How we rate

Financial health

Fair: 68 out of 100. Higher than 57% of charities in its peer group (human services, $10m to $100m).

  • Reserves

    10 of 35

    Spendable reserves would cover 2.6 months of spending.

  • Debt

    16 of 20

    It owes 22% of what it owns.

  • Living within its means

    12 of 15

    Income exceeded spending by 2% of income.

  • Income trend

    15 of 15

    Income rose 23% on the year before.

  • Spending floor

    15 of 15

    94% of spending went to programs and raising each dollar of donations cost 2 cents.

Source: Form 990 for the year ending September 30, 2025, filed with the Internal Revenue Service. Rating method 2026.2. How we rate

Governance

Strong: 100 out of 100. Higher than 35% of charities in its peer group (human services, $10m to $100m).

  • Independent board

    25 of 25

    10 of 10 voting board members are independent.

  • Conflict of interest policy

    15 of 15

    Has a written conflict of interest policy.

  • Whistleblower policy

    8 of 8

    Has a written whistleblower policy.

  • Record keeping policy

    7 of 7

    Has a written policy on keeping and destroying records.

  • Board minutes

    5 of 5

    Keeps minutes of board meetings.

  • Board sees the tax return

    10 of 10

    Gave the board a copy of this return before filing it.

  • Pay set independently

    5 of 5

    Sets its chief executive's pay through independent review and comparison.

  • Independent check of accounts

    15 of 15

    Its accounts were audited by an independent accountant.

  • No reported misuse

    10 of 10

    Reports no diversion of assets, excess benefits or loans to insiders.

Source: Form 990 for the year ending September 30, 2025, filed with the Internal Revenue Service. Rating method 2026.2. How we rate

Impact evidence

Describes programs. Its tax return describes what it does but we have found no measurable results in it.

Programs described in its return (4)
  1. $25.7 million spent. ADMINISTERED SOCIAL WORK, NURSING AND OTHER HUMAN SERVICES UNDER THE MI CHOICE MEDICAID WAIVER PROGRAM FOR PERSONS 65 AND OLDER AND ADULTS WITH DISABILITIES. WELLWISE SERVICES SERVED 930 PARTICIPANTS IN OUR THREE COUNTY AREA. THE WAIVER PROGRAM IS INTENDED FOR SENIORS AND DISABLED INDIVIDUALS WHO REQUIRE A LEVEL OF CARE CONSISTENT WITH THAT WHICH IS PROVIDED IN A NURSING HOME, BUT WHO WISH TO REMAIN LIVING AT HOME OR IN THE COMMUNITY.
  2. $1.0 million spent. PROVIDED FUNDING AND OVERSIGHT FOR HOME DELIVERED MEAL PROGRAMS IN OUR THREE COUNTY AREA FOR ADULTS AGED 60 AND OVER, UNDER USDA TITLE III-C AND STATE FUNDING PROGRAMS. COLLECTIVELY, 561,604 MEALS WERE DELIVERED DURING THE FISCAL YEAR.
  3. $328,253 spent. PROVIDED CARE MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INCLUDING ASSESSMENT, CARE PLAN DEVELOPMENT, AND COORDINATION OF IN-HOME AND OTHER SUPPORTIVE SERVICES FOR 476 INDIVIDUALS AGED 60 AND OVER.
  4. $4.4 million spent. OTHER PROGRAMS INCLUDE CONGREGATE MEALS, ELDER ABUSE PREVENTION, LEGAL AID, COMMUNITY EDUCATION, AND VARIOUS OTHER SERVICES TO IMPROVE THE LIVES OF SENIORS, DISABLED ADULTS AND THEIR CAREGIVERS.

Source: Form 990 for the year ending September 30, 2025, filed with the Internal Revenue Service. Rating method 2026.2. How we rate

Legitimacy checks

  1. Is it registered with the IRS? Passed.

    Listed in the IRS master file of tax-exempt organizations as a 501(c)(3) charitable organization.

    Source: Exempt Organizations Business Master File, Internal Revenue Service, file dated October 13, 2026.

  2. Has the IRS revoked its tax-exempt status? Passed.

    Not on the IRS automatic revocation list.

    Source: Automatic revocation of exemption list, Internal Revenue Service, file dated November 6, 2026.

  3. Are donations tax-deductible? Passed.

    On the IRS list of organizations eligible to receive tax-deductible contributions.

    Source: Publication 78 data: organizations eligible for tax-deductible contributions, Internal Revenue Service, file dated October 13, 2026.

  4. Is it keeping up with its IRS filings? Passed.

    Most recent return on file covers the year ending September 2025.

    Source: Exempt Organizations Business Master File, Internal Revenue Service, file dated October 13, 2026.

  5. How long has it been tax-exempt? Passed.

    Recognized by the IRS since December 1974.

    Source: Exempt Organizations Business Master File, Internal Revenue Service, file dated October 13, 2026.

  6. Is it in good standing with state regulators? Passed.

    Not on California's list of charities barred from soliciting. Other states are not yet checked.

    Source: May Not Operate or Solicit for Charitable Purposes list, California Attorney General, Registry of Charities and Fundraisers, file dated November 4, 2026.

Ratings and checks are our reading of public records, using the published method. They are not a statement about anyone's honesty. If you work for this organization, you can send corrections or results, confirm you want gifts through Veridonate, or ask to be removed from giving.