Ice Fastpitch
Public records show a registered, tax-exempt organization in good standing.
What it says it does
Fostering local regional national girls fastpitch softball
- Income
- $136,296
- Spending
- $136,994
- Reserves
- 0.1 months of spending
- Largest source of income
- other income, 95%
Source: Form 990EZ for the year ending August 31, 2025, filed with the Internal Revenue Service. Rating method 2026.2. How we rate
Financial health
We do not score finances when yearly spending is very small or the return has too little detail. The ratios stop meaning much at that size.
Source: Form 990EZ for the year ending August 31, 2025, filed with the Internal Revenue Service. Rating method 2026.2. How we rate
Governance
This organization files the short tax form, which does not ask about boards, policies or audits. That is normal for a small charity and is not a mark against it.
Source: Form 990EZ for the year ending August 31, 2025, filed with the Internal Revenue Service. Rating method 2026.2. How we rate
Impact evidence
Describes programs. Its tax return describes what it does but we have found no measurable results in it.
Programs described in its return (9)
- $10,489 spent. 9U Klivak had 11 players and two coaches. They played in 10 tournaments as well as winter and summer leagues. The girls continued to learn fundamentals and the importance of team-first attitudes.
- $12,751 spent. 10U Moore had 12 players and three coaches. The team played in 11 tournaments winning three and placing third or better in five others. The team continued working on fundamentals and developing good practice habits.
- $16,150 spent. 11U Richardson had 11 players and two coaches playing in 11 tournaments three of them overnight events. The team was highly successful winning four tournaments and finishing second in four others. The team also played in a winter league.
- $17,613 spent. 12U Pushman had 12 players and two coaches. They played in 8 tournaments winning two and finishing third or higher is two others. The team built on its fundamentals and continued to grow finishing over .500 for the season and retaining all players.
- $22,777 spent. 13U Combs had 12 girls and four coaches. They played in 9 tournaments winning four and placing in the top four of two others. The team was known for competitiveness fair play and player development.
- $13,500 spent. 14U Simpson had 11 players and two coaches. The team played in 10 tournaments including three overnight. The girls showed cohesiveness through some adversity but built on small successes and finished the year on a positive note.
- $13,572 spent. 15U Gavlinski had 11 players and two coaches. The team played in 9 tournaments winning one and finishing third or higher in four others. The team was competitive developed well.
- $12,238 spent. 18U Newbery had 10 players and two coaches. They played in 9 tournaments including several college exposure events. They won three tournaments and a number of girls on the team were college spots or scholarships.
- $14,282 spent. 16U Martin had 11 players and three coaches. This team built on the lessons learned from some struggles the previous year and focused on cohesiveness and supporting each other. They played in 10 tournaments finishing third or higher in four and winning one. A strong team that built strong bonds.
Source: Form 990EZ for the year ending August 31, 2025, filed with the Internal Revenue Service. Rating method 2026.2. How we rate
Legitimacy checks
Is it registered with the IRS? Passed.
Listed in the IRS master file of tax-exempt organizations as a 501(c)(3) charitable organization.
Source: Exempt Organizations Business Master File, Internal Revenue Service, file dated September 7, 2026.
Has the IRS revoked its tax-exempt status? Passed.
Not on the IRS automatic revocation list.
Source: Automatic revocation of exemption list, Internal Revenue Service, file dated September 30, 2026.
Are donations tax-deductible? Passed.
On the IRS list of organizations eligible to receive tax-deductible contributions.
Source: Publication 78 data: organizations eligible for tax-deductible contributions, Internal Revenue Service, file dated September 10, 2026.
Is it keeping up with its IRS filings? Passed.
Most recent return on file covers the year ending August 2025.
Source: Exempt Organizations Business Master File, Internal Revenue Service, file dated September 7, 2026.
How long has it been tax-exempt? Passed.
Recognized by the IRS since December 2008.
Source: Exempt Organizations Business Master File, Internal Revenue Service, file dated September 7, 2026.
Is it in good standing with state regulators? Passed.
Not on California's list of charities barred from soliciting. Other states are not yet checked.
Source: May Not Operate or Solicit for Charitable Purposes list, California Attorney General, Registry of Charities and Fundraisers, file dated October 7, 2026.
Ratings and checks are our reading of public records, using the published method. They are not a statement about anyone's honesty. If you work for this organization, you can send corrections or results, confirm you want gifts through Veridonate, or ask to be removed from giving.