Skip to the page content
Passes our checks

Physicians for Reproductive Health Inc

EIN 13-3693391 · Hartsdale, NY

Public records show a registered, tax-exempt organization in good standing.

LegitimacyPassesRegistration and standingFinancial healthGood79 out of 100GovernanceStrong100 out of 100Impact evidenceDescribes programsHow well its results are evidenced

What it says it does

ORGANIZE, MOBILIZE, AND AMPLIFY THE VOICES OF MEDICAL PROVIDERS TO ADVANCE SEXUAL AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH, RIGHTS, AND JUSTICE. WE ENSURE ACCESS TO ABORTION CARE AND EQUITABLE, COMPREHENSIVE HEALTH CARE.

Income
$4.1 million
Spending
$4.7 million
Spent on programs
86%
Reserves
17.5 months of spending
Largest source of income
donations and private grants, 87%
Employees
23
Volunteers
12
Highest pay
$426,943, president/ceo

Source: Form 990 for the year ending June 30, 2025, filed with the Internal Revenue Service. Rating method 2026.2. How we rate

Financial health

Good: 79 out of 100. Higher than 50% of charities in its peer group (civil rights, $1m to $10m).

  • Reserves

    35 of 35

    Spendable reserves would cover 17.5 months of spending.

  • Debt

    20 of 20

    It owes 2% of what it owns.

  • Living within its means

    4 of 15

    Spending exceeded income by 13% of income.

  • Income trend

    5 of 15

    Income fell 19% on the year before.

  • Spending floor

    15 of 15

    86% of spending went to programs and raising each dollar of donations cost 9 cents.

Source: Form 990 for the year ending June 30, 2025, filed with the Internal Revenue Service. Rating method 2026.2. How we rate

Governance

Strong: 100 out of 100. Higher than 59% of charities in its peer group (civil rights, $1m to $10m).

  • Independent board

    25 of 25

    12 of 12 voting board members are independent.

  • Conflict of interest policy

    15 of 15

    Has a written conflict of interest policy.

  • Whistleblower policy

    8 of 8

    Has a written whistleblower policy.

  • Record keeping policy

    7 of 7

    Has a written policy on keeping and destroying records.

  • Board minutes

    5 of 5

    Keeps minutes of board meetings.

  • Board sees the tax return

    10 of 10

    Gave the board a copy of this return before filing it.

  • Pay set independently

    5 of 5

    Sets its chief executive's pay through independent review and comparison.

  • Independent check of accounts

    15 of 15

    Its accounts were audited by an independent accountant.

  • No reported misuse

    10 of 10

    Reports no diversion of assets, excess benefits or loans to insiders.

Source: Form 990 for the year ending June 30, 2025, filed with the Internal Revenue Service. Rating method 2026.2. How we rate

Impact evidence

Describes programs. Its tax return describes what it does but we have found no measurable results in it.

Programs described in its return (5)
  1. $1.0 million spent. Education, Research and Training Thirty-two fellows were selected to participate in the Leadership Training Academy (LTA) Fellowship Class of 2025, chosen from over 60 applicants. The Class of 2025 included physicians from 20 states as well as the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico. One in-depth training was held virtually and one was in person, in Washington, DC In both trainings, the group participated in sessions focused on media skills, professional leadership and policy advocacy including an advocacy day. Additionally, the class attended six webinars. Our Alumni Program continued to foster community, offer updated advocacy skills training, and promote engagement between LTA Alumni, PRH staff and our community partners, including a summit in North Carolina.
  2. $1.3 million spent. Public Policy and Community Support Over the past year, our physician-advocates and staff served as trusted authorities and impacted a range of reproductive health discussions and dialogues in the public arena. We continue to be in close relationships with federal and state coalition partners, working to effectively advocate for expanded access to reproductive health care and speaking out against harmful restrictions. Specific highlights include: . PRH staff and members of the PRH network met regularly with policymakers lending expertise on a variety of reproductive health issues. o Our 2025 Leadership Training Academy class met with offices on Capitol Hill to discuss immigrant access to health care and the harmful practice of shackling pregnant prisoners. o PRH staff and network members briefed policymakers and their staffs on reproductive health topics. . PRH continued our blog series about public policy issues and reproductive health focusing. . PRH published resources for physician advocates on a variety of issues related to access to reproductive health care. . PRH authored an amicus brief to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals about access to abortion care in emergency situations under EMTALA in US v. Idaho. . PRH Fellow Dr. Nisha Verma testified at a Senate Subcommittee on Human Rights and the Law field hearing.
  3. $1.4 million spent. Communications As dedicated advocates for the communities in which they live and work, our physicians continue to provide an expert perspective on reproductive health care and explain clearly how restrictions on any aspect of reproductive health care impact their ability to provide evidence-based care to patients. They offered front line and expert perspectives on the ripple effect of abortion bans and how they've impacted provider training inequities, the intersection of criminalization and abortion bans, and devastating implications on maternal and infant health. Through testimony, reporter education, media appearances in print and online, on the radio, and on television, and speaking out on their personal social media platforms, there were many opportunities to demonstrate the harm caused by health care restrictions on state and national levels and center the compassion, research, and evidence at the core of the work we do. In the 2024 fiscal year from July 2023 to June 2024, the PRH social media accounts lifted up the expertise of our physician advocates to our over 30,000 followers. PRH.org had over 50,000 unique users with over 70,000 sessions. . Our doctors spoke out on reproductive health access in The Associated Press, UPI, Huffington Post, Politico, The Nation, Washington Post, Wall Street Journal, and more. . Our physician advocates regularly engaged reporters on the safety of medication abortion, the variety of reasons people need access to abortion care including in emergency situations, the real threat of criminalization on pregnant people across the country, the safety of self-managed abortion, and the long-lasting impact of abortion restrictions on provider education and community safety.
  4. $67,103 spent. GDC:GLOBAL DOCTORS FOR CHOICE
  5. $316,277 spent. CERCL-FP:Centering Equity, Race & Cultural Literac

Source: Form 990 for the year ending June 30, 2025, filed with the Internal Revenue Service. Rating method 2026.2. How we rate

Legitimacy checks

  1. Is it registered with the IRS? Passed.

    Listed in the IRS master file of tax-exempt organizations as a 501(c)(3) charitable organization.

    Source: Exempt Organizations Business Master File, Internal Revenue Service, file dated October 13, 2026.

  2. Has the IRS revoked its tax-exempt status? Passed.

    Not on the IRS automatic revocation list.

    Source: Automatic revocation of exemption list, Internal Revenue Service, file dated October 13, 2026.

  3. Are donations tax-deductible? Passed.

    On the IRS list of organizations eligible to receive tax-deductible contributions.

    Source: Publication 78 data: organizations eligible for tax-deductible contributions, Internal Revenue Service, file dated October 13, 2026.

  4. Is it keeping up with its IRS filings? Passed.

    Most recent return on file covers the year ending June 2025.

    Source: Exempt Organizations Business Master File, Internal Revenue Service, file dated October 13, 2026.

  5. How long has it been tax-exempt? Passed.

    Recognized by the IRS since May 1993.

    Source: Exempt Organizations Business Master File, Internal Revenue Service, file dated October 13, 2026.

  6. Is it in good standing with state regulators? Passed.

    Not on California's list of charities barred from soliciting. Other states are not yet checked.

    Source: May Not Operate or Solicit for Charitable Purposes list, California Attorney General, Registry of Charities and Fundraisers, file dated October 21, 2026.

Ratings and checks are our reading of public records, using the published method. They are not a statement about anyone's honesty. If you work for this organization, you can send corrections or results, confirm you want gifts through Veridonate, or ask to be removed from giving.